top of page

Case Credibility Rating System

★★★★★★★★★★   DEBUNKED

​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​

Primarily anecdotal, anonymous or unverifiable witnesses, story surfaced long afterward, little/no contemporary documentation, serious inconsistencies, or evidence of fabrication.

​

Identifiable witness or source, but evidence is weak. Limited corroboration, secondhand reporting, questionable documentation, or plausible conventional explanations significantly weaken the case.

​

Credible identifiable witnesses and reasonable documentation. Some independent corroboration may exist, but important uncertainties remain or conventional explanations cannot be confidently excluded.

​

Multiple credible or independent witnesses, strong contemporary documentation, and/or supporting photographic, radar, physical, military, police, or scientific evidence. Conventional explanations have been investigated but remain inadequate or disputed.

​

Exceptionally well-documented case involving multiple independent sources and several mutually supporting forms of evidence. Records have strong provenance, major details are independently corroborated, and extensive investigation has failed to produce a convincing conventional explanation.

A case revealed to be either a deliberate hoax or easily and undeniably explained through conventional explanations.

 

★★★★★★★★★★   Very Low

★★★★★★★★★★   Very Low

★★★★★★★★★★    Low

★★★★★★★★★★    Low

★★★★★★★★★★    Moderate

★★★★★★★★★★    Moderate

★★★★★★★★★★    High

★★★★★★★★★★    High

★★★★★★★★★★    Exceptional

★★★★★★★★★★    Exceptional

© 2026 by UFO History. All rights reserved.

bottom of page